Neuroarchitecture in Interior Design: Impact of Space on Human Behaviour
Keywords:
Neuroarchitecture, Interior Design, Human Behaviour, Built EnvironmentAbstract
Neuroarchitecture is an interdisciplinary field that combines neuroscience, architecture, and interior design to understand how built environments influence human emotions, cognition, health, and behavior. In interior design, neuroarchitecture focuses on creating spaces that positively affect occupants' psychological and physiological well-being through the strategic use of elements such as lighting, color, spatial layout, materials, acoustics, and biophilic design. The impact of interior environments on human behavior has become increasingly significant as people spend a substantial portion of their lives indoors. Research indicates that well-designed spaces can enhance productivity, creativity, concentration, social interaction, and emotional stability, while poorly designed environments may contribute to stress, anxiety, fatigue, and reduced performance. Neuroarchitectural principles utilize evidence-based design approaches to optimize sensory experiences and support cognitive functioning. Natural lighting, ergonomic furniture, appropriate color schemes, and connections to nature have been shown to improve mood and overall well-being. This study explores the relationship between interior design elements and human behavior through the lens of neuroarchitecture, highlighting how scientific understanding of brain responses can inform the creation of healthier, more comfortable, and user-centered environments. The findings emphasize the importance of integrating neuroscience into interior design practices to develop spaces that not only meet functional requirements but also foster psychological comfort, behavioral efficiency, and enhanced quality of life. The growing application of neuroarchitecture offers promising opportunities for designing residential, educational, healthcare, and workplace environments that support human well-being and sustainable living.
References
J. Pallasmaa, The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses, 3rd ed. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 2012.
S. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2008.
H. Mallgrave, The Architect's Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity, and Architecture. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
J. Eberhard, Brain Landscape: The Coexistence of Neuroscience and Architecture. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2009.
A. S. Devlin, Environmental Psychology and Human Well-Being. London, U.K.: Academic Press, 2018.
E. H. Zube and G. T. Moore, Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design, vol. 4. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press, 1991.
C. Montgomery, Happy City: Transforming Our Lives Through Urban Design. New York, NY, USA: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.
E. B. Goldhagen, Welcome to Your World: How the Built Environment Shapes Our Lives. New York, NY, USA: HarperCollins, 2017.
M. Vartanian, A. Navarrete, A. Chatterjee, G. Fich, C. Leder, and O. Modroño, “Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 41, pp. 10–18, 2015.
A. Chatterjee and O. Vartanian, “Neuroaesthetics,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 370–375, Jul. 2014.
R. Ulrich, “View through a window may influence recovery from surgery,” Science, vol. 224, no. 4647, pp. 420–421, Apr. 1984.
F. H. Gage, “Neurogenesis in the adult brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 612–613, 2002.
C. Sternberg and J. Wilson, “Neuroscience and architecture: Seeking common ground,” Cell, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 2006.
A. Joye, “Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture,” Review of General Psychology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 305–328, 2007.
O. Vartanian, G. Navarrete, A. Chatterjee, G. Fich, P. Leder, and M. Skov, “Impact of contour and spatial characteristics on aesthetic preferences in architecture,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. Suppl. 2, pp. 10446–10453, 2013.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


