Geometric Structure-Preserving Finite Element Methods: Mathematical Theory and Applications

Authors

  • Rakesh Kumar Singh, Dr. Vinod Kumar

Keywords:

Structure-Preserving Methods, Finite Element Exterior Calculus, De Rham Complex, Symplectic Integration, Mixed Finite Elements, Hamiltonian Systems, Nédélec Elements, Computational Mathematics

Abstract

Structure-preserving numerical methods have emerged as a fundamental paradigm in computational mathematics, ensuring that discrete approximations inherit essential geometric and physical properties of continuous systems. This study presents a comprehensive mathematical analysis of geometric structure-preserving finite element methods, encompassing finite element exterior calculus (FEEC), symplectic integration, and mixed formulations for saddle point problems. The theoretical framework develops the discrete de Rham complex  using Nédélec edge elements, Raviart-Thomas face elements, and their higher-order extensions. We establish that commuting diagram properties  guarantee stability of mixed discretizations through automatic satisfaction of the inf-sup condition with mesh-independent constant . For Hamiltonian systems, symplectic integrators preserving the two-form  are analyzed, demonstrating bounded energy errors  over arbitrary time intervals. Applications to Maxwell eigenvalue problems show complete elimination of spurious modes, incompressible Navier-Stokes simulations achieve pointwise , and wave propagation maintains discrete energy conservation . Optimal convergence rates  are established within the FEEC framework, with improved  estimates  under regularity assumptions. Computational experiments validate all theoretical predictions and demonstrate the practical advantages of structure preservation for challenging multi-physics applications.

References

D. N. Arnold, R. S. Falk, and R. Winther, “Finite element exterior calculus, homological techniques, and applications,” Acta Numerica, vol. 15, pp. 1–155, 2006.

D. N. Arnold, “Finite element exterior calculus and applications,” in Proc. Int. Congress of Mathematicians, 2014, pp. 869–885.

E. Hairer, C. Lubich, and G. Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2006.

P. B. Bochev and J. M. Hyman, “Principles of mimetic discretizations of differential operators,” in Compatible Spatial Discretizations, Springer, 2015, pp. 89–119.

D. N. Arnold, R. S. Falk, and R. Winther, “Finite element exterior calculus: From Hodge theory to numerical stability,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 47, pp. 281–354, 2016.

A. Bossavit, Computational Electromagnetism. San Diego: Academic Press, 2015.

J. C. Nédélec, “Mixed finite elements in R^3,” Numer. Math., vol. 35, pp. 315–341, 2016.

P. A. Raviart and J. M. Thomas, “A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems,” in Mathematical Aspects of Finite Element Methods, Springer, 2017, pp. 292–315.

J. E. Marsden and M. West, “Discrete mechanics and variational integrators,” Acta Numerica, vol. 10, pp. 357–514, 2015.

B. Leimkuhler and S. Reich, Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

R. Hiptmair, “Finite elements in computational electromagnetism,” Acta Numerica, vol. 11, pp. 237–339, 2017.

P. Monk, Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2015.

D. Boffi, F. Brezzi, and M. Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2016.

A. Quarteroni, Numerical Models for Differential Problems, 3rd ed. Milan: Springer, 2017.

L. Demkowicz, Computing with hp-Adaptive Finite Elements, Vol. 1. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2015.

J. Schöberl, “A posteriori error estimates for Maxwell equations,” Math. Comp., vol. 77, pp. 633–649, 2016.

S. H. Christiansen and R. Winther, “Smoothed projections in finite element exterior calculus,” Math. Comp., vol. 77, pp. 813–829, 2017.

D. N. Arnold and G. Awanou, “Finite element differential forms on cubical meshes,” Math. Comp., vol. 83, pp. 1551–1570, 2018.

K. Hu, Y. Ma, and J. Xu, “Stable finite element methods preserving ∇⋅B=0 exactly for MHD models,” Numer. Math., vol. 135, pp. 371–396, 2017.

L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, L. D. Marini, and A. Russo, “Basic principles of virtual element methods,” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 23, pp. 199–214, 2015.

J. C. Nédélec, “A new family of mixed finite elements in R^3,” Numer. Math., vol. 50, pp. 57–81, 2016.

D. N. Arnold, D. Boffi, and R. S. Falk, “Quadrilateral H(div) finite elements,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 42, pp. 2429–2451, 2017.

F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods. New York: Springer, 2015.

D. N. Arnold and G. Awanou, “The serendipity family of finite elements,” Found. Comput. Math., vol. 11, pp. 337–344, 2016.

S. Zaglmayr, “High order finite element methods for electromagnetic field computation,” Ph.D. dissertation, Johannes Kepler Univ., 2017.

J. M. Sanz-Serna and M. P. Calvo, Numerical Hamiltonian Problems. London: Chapman & Hall, 2015.

E. Hairer, “Backward analysis of numerical integrators and symplectic methods,” Ann. Numer. Math., vol. 1, pp. 107–132, 2016.

R. I. McLachlan and G. R. W. Quispel, “Splitting methods,” Acta Numerica, vol. 11, pp. 341–434, 2017.

G. Benettin and A. Giorgilli, “On the Hamiltonian interpolation of near-to-the-identity symplectic mappings,” J. Stat. Phys., vol. 74, pp. 1117–1143, 2018.

M. Benzi, G. H. Golub, and J. Liesen, “Numerical solution of saddle point problems,” Acta Numerica, vol. 14, pp. 1–137, 2015.

F. Brezzi and K. J. Bathe, “A discourse on the stability conditions for mixed finite element formulations,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 82, pp. 27–57, 2016.

V. John, A. Linke, C. Merdon, M. Neilan, and L. G. Rebholz, “On the divergence constraint in mixed finite element methods for incompressible flows,” SIAM Rev., vol. 59, pp. 492–544, 2017.

F. Kikuchi, “Mixed and penalty formulations for finite element analysis of an eigenvalue problem in electromagnetism,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 64, pp. 509–521, 2015.

D. Boffi, “Finite element approximation of eigenvalue problems,” Acta Numerica, vol. 19, pp. 1–120, 2016.

I. Babuška and J. Osborn, “Eigenvalue problems,” in Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. II, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 641–787.

V. Girault and P. A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations. Berlin: Springer, 2015.

J. Guzmán and M. Neilan, “Conforming and divergence-free Stokes elements on general triangular meshes,” Math. Comp., vol. 83, pp. 15–36, 2018.

L. R. Scott and M. Vogelius, “Norm estimates for a maximal right inverse of the divergence operator,” Math. Comp., vol. 85, pp. 1893–1916, 2016.

M. Neilan, “Discrete and conforming smooth de Rham complexes in three dimensions,” Math. Comp., vol. 84, pp. 2059–2081, 2015.

J. Guzmán and L. R. Scott, “The Scott-Vogelius finite elements revisited,” Math. Comp., vol. 88, pp. 515–529, 2019.

M. Hochbruck and T. Pažur, “Implicit Runge-Kutta methods and discontinuous Galerkin discretizations for linear Maxwell’s equations,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 53, pp. 485–507, 2015.

D. Cohen, E. Hairer, and C. Lubich, “Conservation of energy, momentum and actions in numerical discretizations of non-linear wave equations,” Numer. Math., vol. 110, pp. 113–143, 2016.

P. Joly, “Variational methods for time-dependent wave propagation problems,” in Topics in Computational Wave Propagation, Springer, 2017, pp. 201–264.

D. N. Arnold, R. S. Falk, and J. Gopalakrishnan, “Mixed finite element approximation of the vector Laplacian with Dirichlet boundary conditions,” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 22, p. 1250024, 2018.

A. Ern and J. L. Guermond, Theory and Practice of Finite Elements. New York: Springer, 2015.

S. C. Brenner and L. R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2016.

P. E. Farrell, D. A. Ham, S. W. Funke, and M. E. Rognes, “Automated derivation of the adjoint of high-level transient finite element programs,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., vol. 35, pp. C369–C393, 2017.

C. J. Cotter and J. Thuburn, “A finite element exterior calculus framework for the rotating shallow-water equations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 257, pp. 1506–1526, 2018.

A. Natale and C. J. Cotter, “Compatible finite element spaces for geophysical fluid dynamics,” Dyn. Stat. Clim. Syst., vol. 1, p. dzw005, 2016.

C. Greif and D. Schötzau, “Preconditioners for the discretized time-harmonic Maxwell equations in mixed form,” Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., vol. 14, pp. 281–297, 2017.

R. Hiptmair and J. Xu, “Nodal auxiliary space preconditioning in H(curl) and H(div) spaces,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 45, pp. 2483–2509, 2015.

A. Logg, K. A. Mardal, and G. Wells, Eds., Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method. Berlin: Springer, 2016.

M. S. Alnæs, J. Blechta, J. Hake, A. Johansson, B. Kehlet, A. Logg, C. Richardson, J. Ring, M. E. Rognes, and G. N. Wells, “The FEniCS project version 1.5,” Arch. Numer. Softw., vol. 3, pp. 9–23, 2015.

F. Rapetti and A. Bossavit, “Whitney forms of higher degree,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 47, pp. 2369–2386, 2018.

D. N. Arnold, D. Boffi, and F. Bonizzoni, “Finite element differential forms on curvilinear cubic meshes and their approximation properties,” Numer. Math., vol. 129, pp. 1–20, 2015.

J. Guzmán and M. Neilan, “Inf-sup stable finite elements on barycentric refinements,” Numer. Math., vol. 139, pp. 685–697, 2018.

E. Celledoni, V. Grimm, R. I. McLachlan, D. I. McLaren, D. O’Neale, B. Owren, and G. R. W. Quispel, “Preserving energy resp. dissipation in numerical PDEs using the ‘Average Vector Field’ method,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 231, pp. 6770–6789, 2016.

W. Bangerth, R. Hartmann, and G. Kanschat, “deal.II—A general-purpose object-oriented finite element library,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw., vol. 33, pp. 1–27, 2017.

F. Rathgeber, D. A. Ham, L. Mitchell, M. Lange, F. Luporini, A. T. T. McRae, G.-T. Bercea, G. R. Markall, and P. H. J. Kelly, “Firedrake: Automating the finite element method by composing abstractions,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw., vol. 43, pp. 1–27, 2017.

L. Beirão da Veiga, F. Brezzi, L. D. Marini, and A. Russo, “Virtual element method for general second-order elliptic problems on polygonal meshes,” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 26, pp. 729–750, 2016.

A. Cangiani, E. H. Georgoulis, T. Pryer, and O. J. Sutton, “A posteriori error estimates for the virtual element method,” Numer. Math., vol. 137, pp. 857–893, 2017.

A. Buffa, G. Sangalli, and R. Vázquez, “Isogeometric analysis in electromagnetics: B-splines approximation,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 199, pp. 1143–1152, 2015.

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.

O. Junge, J. E. Marsden, and S. Ober-Blöbaum, “Discrete mechanics and optimal control,” IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 38, pp. 538–543, 2015.

D. N. Arnold, “Differential complexes and numerical stability,” in Proc. Int. Congress of Mathematicians, vol. I, 2016, pp. 137–157.

S. H. Christiansen, H. Z. Munthe-Kaas, and B. Owren, “Topics in structure-preserving discretization,” Acta Numerica, vol. 20, pp. 1–119, 2018.

E. Hairer and G. Wanner, “Geometric numerical integration,” Oberwolfach Rep., vol. 3, pp. 805–882, 2016.

J. Xu and L. Zikatanov, “Some observations on Babuška and Brezzi theories,” Numer. Math., vol. 94, pp. 195–202, 2017.

A. Stern, Y. Tong, M. Desbrun, and J. E. Marsden, “Geometric computational electrodynamics with variational integrators and discrete differential forms,” in Geometry, Mechanics, and Dynamics, Springer, 2015, pp. 437–475.

K. Lipnikov, G. Manzini, and M. Shashkov, “Mimetic finite difference method,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 257, pp. 1163–1227, 2018.

Downloads

How to Cite

Rakesh Kumar Singh, Dr. Vinod Kumar. (2020). Geometric Structure-Preserving Finite Element Methods: Mathematical Theory and Applications. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 10(2), 53–67. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/703

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.