Job and Personal Resources as Dual Drivers of Employee Engagement and Performance: An Integrative Conceptual Review

Authors

  • Dr. Rajeshwari Gwal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65578/ijesh.v15.i4.421

Keywords:

Vigor, Dedication, Absorption, Employee Engagement

Abstract

Employee engagement has attracted sustained interest because of its association with positive individual and organizational outcomes, yet there is still debate about what drives engagement and how it should be conceptualized. Building on the job demands–resources (JD‑R) perspective and recent engagement literature, this conceptual paper examines how job resources (e.g., autonomy, feedback, supervisor support) and personal resources (e.g., self‑efficacy, optimism, resilience) jointly shape employees’ cognitive, emotional, and behavioural investment in their roles. The paper first clarifies engagement as a positive, work‑related state of vigor, dedication, and absorption, and then synthesizes evidence on key antecedents and outcomes of engagement in different organizational contexts (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004; Christian et al., 2011). An integrative model is proposed in which job and personal resources reinforce one another, especially under high job demands, and engagement mediates their effects on performance, well‑being, and retention (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Xanthopoulou et al., 2009). The paper identifies research gaps around cultural differences, demographic variables, and interventions, and outlines implications for managers seeking to build sustainable engagement

References

Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7–35.

Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265–269.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.

Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284.

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512.

Farndale, E., Beijer, S., Van Veldhoven, M., Kelliher, C., & Hope Hailey, V. (2014). Work and organisation engagement: Aligning research and practice. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(2), 157–176.

Gan, Y., & Gan, Y. (2014). Personality and work engagement: The mediating role of job demands and job resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 1–20.

Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513.

Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work–unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 78–91.

Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). Psychology Press.

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.

Hewitt. (2001). Employee engagement: A driver of organizational performance. Hewitt Associates.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2017). Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 792–812.

Langelaan, S., Bakker, A. B., Van Doornen, L. J. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 40(3), 521–532.

Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572.

Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30.

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.

Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.

Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19–38.sciencedirect

Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116–131.

Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217–1227.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

Simbula, S., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). A three wave study of job resources, self efficacy, and work engagement among Italian schoolteachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 285–304.

Soane, E., Truss, C., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2012). Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement. Human Resource Development International, 15(5), 529–547.

Sonnentag, S. (2011). Recovery from fatigue: The role of psychological detachment. In P. L. Ackerman (Ed.), Cognitive fatigue (pp. 253–272). American Psychological Association.

Sun, L., & Bunchapattanasakda, C. (2019). Employee engagement: A literature review. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(1), 63–80.

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands–resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141.

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 183–200.

Downloads

How to Cite

Dr. Rajeshwari Gwal. (2025). Job and Personal Resources as Dual Drivers of Employee Engagement and Performance: An Integrative Conceptual Review. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 15(4), 382–389. https://doi.org/10.65578/ijesh.v15.i4.421