Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Pathways to Ethical Business and Long-Term Competitiveness

Authors

  • Raghav Mittal

Keywords:

Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Stakeholder Theory, Triple Bottom Line

Abstract

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) have become indispensable dimensions of contemporary business strategy. Once viewed as voluntary or peripheral practices confined to philanthropy and compliance, these concepts have evolved into integral elements of organizational decision-making. Modern corporations are expected not only to generate economic value but also to address broader societal and environmental challenges such as climate change, resource depletion, poverty, and inequality. This shift reflects a growing consensus that long-term competitiveness and legitimacy in business are inseparable from responsible and sustainable practices. The interconnection between sustainability and CSR has been increasingly emphasized in both theory and practice. Frameworks such as the stakeholder theory highlight the importance of balancing the interests of multiple groups beyond shareholders, while the triple bottom line underscores the need to harmonize economic performance with social equity and environmental stewardship. Additionally, the concept of shared value creation demonstrates how businesses can achieve competitive advantage by embedding social progress into their core operations. These approaches collectively redefine corporate responsibility, moving it from a peripheral activity to a central pillar of strategic management.

References

Carroll, A. B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 114–120.

Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up? London: Earthscan.

Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

Zadek, S. (2001). The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship. London: Earthscan.

Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press.

Visser, W. (2011). The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business. Wiley.

Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.

Downloads

How to Cite

Raghav Mittal. (2014). Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Pathways to Ethical Business and Long-Term Competitiveness. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Humanities, 4(4), 22–29. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/index.php/j/article/view/185

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.