A Comprehensive Review of Numerical Methods for Solving Nonlinear Equations and Optimization Problems

Authors

  • Borase Asmita Pravin, Dr. Shoyeb Ali Sayyed

Keywords:

nonlinear equations; numerical methods; iterative methods; Newton-Raphson method; optimization; convergence analysis; metaheuristics; gradient descent

Abstract

Nonlinear equations and optimization problems lie at the heart of computational science, appearing in fields as diverse as engineering design, economics, machine learning, power systems, and the physical and biological sciences. Because closed-form analytical solutions rarely exist, numerical methods provide the practical means of obtaining accurate approximate solutions. This review presents a structured and comprehensive survey of the principal numerical methods used to solve nonlinear equations and optimization problems, tracing their development from classical iterative schemes such as the Newton-Raphson and quasi-Newton families to modern higher-order multi-step methods, derivative-free techniques, gradient-based optimizers, and population-based metaheuristics. We examine the theoretical foundations governing convergence order, computational efficiency, and stability, and we discuss the efficiency index as a unifying measure for comparing methods that differ in the number of function evaluations per iteration. The review synthesizes recent advances reported between 2015 and 2021, highlighting trends toward high-order convergence with reduced functional evaluations, the avoidance of second derivatives through finite-difference approximations, and the hybridization of deterministic and stochastic search strategies. Particular attention is given to the parallel evolution of optimization algorithms in machine learning, where adaptive gradient methods such as AdaGrad, RMSProp, and Adam have reshaped large-scale training, and to the emergence of Newton-inspired metaheuristics that balance exploration and exploitation in non-convex landscapes. Across these developments, recurring challenges include guaranteeing global convergence, handling ill-conditioning and high dimensionality, and escaping local optima. The review concludes by identifying open problems and promising directions, including the integration of higher-order curvature information, robustness under limited data, and the convergence of classical numerical analysis with data-driven optimization. By consolidating these strands, this paper aims to serve as a coherent reference for researchers and practitioners navigating the rich landscape of nonlinear solvers and optimizers.

References

Ababneh, O. (2022). New iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations and their basins of attraction. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 21, 9–16.

Armijo, N. F., Bello-Cruz, Y., & Haeser, G. (2021). A semismooth Newton method for general projection equations applied to the nearest correlation matrix problem. Optimization and Control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401 (math.OC).

Foret, P., Kleiner, A., Mobahi, H., & Neyshabur, B. (2021). Sharpness-aware minimization for efficiently improving generalization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2021).

Ghaemifard, S., et al. (2021). A comparison of metaheuristic algorithms for structural optimization: Performance and efficiency analysis. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2054173.

Gholizadeh, S., Danesh, M., & Gheyratmand, C. (2020). A new Newton metaheuristic algorithm for discrete performance-based design optimization of steel moment frames. Computers & Structures, 234, 106250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106250

Kansal, M., Cordero, A., Bhalla, S., & Torregrosa, J. R. (2021). New fourth- and sixth-order classes of iterative methods for solving systems of nonlinear equations and their stability analysis. Numerical Algorithms, 87, 1017–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-020-00997-4

Kucera, V. (2022). Numerical methods for nonlinear equations. Charles University, Prague.

Maurya, M., & Yadav, N. (2023). A comparative analysis of gradient-based optimization methods for machine learning problems. In Proceedings on International Conference on Data Analytics and Computing (ICDAC 2022) (Vol. 175, pp. 85–98). Springer.

Morshed, M. S. (2022). Augmented Newton method for optimization: Global linear rate and momentum interpretation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11033.

Nadeem, G. A., Aslam, W., & Ali, F. (2023). An optimal fourth-order second-derivative-free iterative method for nonlinear scientific equations. Kuwait Journal of Science, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.48129/kjs.18253

Recent advances in optimization methods for machine learning: A systematic review. (2022). Mathematics, 13(13), 2210.

Sana, G., et al. (2020). Iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications.

Shen, L., Chen, C., Zou, F., Jie, Z., Sun, J., & Liu, W. (2021). A unified analysis of AdaGrad with weighted aggregation and momentum acceleration. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35(10), 14482–14490.

Sowmya, R., et al. (2021). Newton-Raphson-based optimizer: A new population-based metaheuristic algorithm for continuous optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 128, 107532.

Thota, S., & Shanmugasundaram, P. (2022). On new sixth and seventh order iterative methods for solving nonlinear equations using homotopy perturbation technique. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), 267.

Traore, C., & Pauwels, E. (2021). Sequential convergence of AdaGrad algorithm for smooth convex optimization. Operations Research Letters, 49(4), 452–458.

Usman, M., Iqbal, J., Khan, A., Ullah, I., Khan, H., & Alzabut, J. (2022). A new iterative multi-step method for solving nonlinear equation. MethodsX, 14, 103394.

Villafuerte, R., et al. (2019). A fourth-order Newton-type iterative method for solving nonlinear equations in electric power systems. International Journal of Applied Mathematics.

Wadia, N., et al. (2021). A gentle introduction to gradient-based optimization and variational inequalities for machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04877.

Xu, D., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., & Mandic, D. P. (2021). Convergence of the RMSProp deep learning method with penalty for nonconvex optimization. Neural Networks, 139, 17–23.

Yang, X.-S. (2021). A generalized evolutionary metaheuristic (GEM) algorithm for engineering optimization. Cogent Engineering, 11(1), 2364041.

Downloads

How to Cite

Borase Asmita Pravin, Dr. Shoyeb Ali Sayyed. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Numerical Methods for Solving Nonlinear Equations and Optimization Problems. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 15(1), 494–503. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/965

Similar Articles

<< < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.