A Case Study of Down Syndrome with No Prior Intervention Until 5.5 Years: Implications for Developmental Rehabilitation
Keywords:
Down Syndrome, Developmental Delay, Early Intervention, Developmental Rehabilitation, Child Developmental Outcomes.Abstract
Purpose
Children with Down syndrome frequently demonstrate developmental difficulties affecting fine and gross motor skills, activities of daily living, receptive and expressive language, cognitive functioning, emotional regulation, social interaction, sensory processing, balancing. These challenges may interfere with independence, communication, learning and participation in daily activities. The chief complaints presented by the parents initially in the present case were, under sensitive sensory response, poor eye contact, poor eye hand coordination, limited attention span, dragging of hand during activities, poor command following and response to instructions, difficulty in performing tasks appropriately, preference for remaining within the comfort zone, weak core and back muscles, poor fine motor skills and grasping ability, fear during balancing activities, and poor verbal a well as non-verbal communication. Main aim was to elevate the effectiveness of structured therapeutic interventions in improving motor abilities, communication skills, cognitive functioning, emotional and social skills, sensory processing, balancing, and overall adaptive functioning in a child diagnosed with Down syndrome.
Method
A 6-year-old Male child was diagnosed with Down syndrome underwent Seguin Form Board Test (SFBT), Vineland Social Maturity Scale (VSMS), and Developmental Screening Test (DST). Initial evaluation revealed that form perception was not yet developed; the task could not be completed, and the mental age was found to be below 2.5 years. The developmental age was 1 year 2 months 9 days, and social age was 1 year 20 days. Therapy sessions included task-oriented activities, play-based exercise, communication training and parent guidance to improve the child’s overall functional performance and participation.
Result
Following the intervention plan, the child demonstrated improvement in eye contact, attention span, command following, balance, fine motor and grasping skills, core stability, participation in activities, and verbal as well as non-verbal communication. Progress was also observed in sensory responses, social interaction, emotional regulation, and overall functional independence in daily activities.
Conclusion
The present case study highlights that structured multidisciplinary intervention can effectively improve communication, motor functioning, sensory processing, balance, cognitive abilities, and social-emotional skills in a child with Down Syndrome. Early and consistent therapeutic support plays an important role in enhancing functional independence, participation in daily activities, and overall quality of life.
References
Chapman Robin S. (2006). Language learning in Down syndrome: The speech and language profile compared to adolescents with cognitive impairment of unknown origin. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 10(2), 61–66.
Fidler Deborah J. (2005). The emerging Down syndrome behavioral phenotype in early childhood. Infants & Young Children, 18(2), 86–103.
Abbeduto Leonard, Warren, S. F., & Conners, F. A. (2007). Language development in Down syndrome: From the prelinguistic period to the acquisition of literacy. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(3), 247–261.
Miller Jon F. (1999). Profiles of language development in children with Down syndrome. In Improving the Communication of People with Down Syndrome. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Roberts Joanne E., Price, J., Barnes, E., Nelson, L., Burchinal, M., Hennon, E., Moskowitz, L., Edwards, A., Malkin, C., Anderson, K., & Misenheimer, J. (2007). Receptive vocabulary, expressive vocabulary, and speech production of boys with fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 112(3), 177–193.
Kumin Libby (2006). Speech Intelligibility and Childhood Verbal Apraxia in Children with Down Syndrome. Down Syndrome Education International.
Buckley Sue, & Le Prevost, P. (2002). Speech and language therapy for children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome News and Update, 2(2), 70–76.
National Down Syndrome Society (2023). Speech and language development for children with Down syndrome. New York, USA.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2024). Down Syndrome: Communication Disorders and Speech-Language Intervention. Practice Portal.
Laws Glynis, & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down syndrome and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(6), 1324–1339.
Martin Gail E., Klusek, J., Estigarribia, B., & Roberts, J. E. (2009). Language characteristics of individuals with Down syndrome. Topics in Language Disorders, 29(2), 112–132.
Rondal Jean A. (1995). Exceptional Language Development in Down Syndrome: Implications for the Cognition-Language Relationship. Cambridge University Press.
Wishart Jennifer G. (2001). Cognitive development in children with Down syndrome: Recent advances and future prospects. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7(1), 35–40.
Dykens Elisabeth M., Hodapp, R. M., & Evans, D. W. (2006). Profiles and development of adaptive behavior in children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111(5), 347–360.
Roizen Nancy J., & Patterson, D. (2003). Down syndrome. The Lancet, 361(9365), 1281–1289.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
