Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation in India: A Critical Review of Law and Governance
Keywords:
Judicial Activism; Public Interest Litigation; Supreme Court of India; Rule of Law; Governance; Fundamental Rights; Judicial ReviewAbstract
Judicial activism has become a powerful force in shaping India's legal and governance landscape. With tools like Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the judiciary has stepped beyond its traditional role, tackling issues related to social justice, environmental protection, and administrative accountability. This review paper takes a close look at how judicial activism has evolved, its scope, and its impact in India, especially focusing on PIL as a key player in democratic governance. By diving into scholarly literature, landmark rulings, and institutional changes, the study sheds light on both the successes and challenges of judicial intervention. While judicial activism has improved access to justice and safeguarded fundamental rights, it has also sparked debates about judicial overreach and the separation of powers. The paper wraps up by emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to uphold the integrity of democratic institutions while ensuring justice and accountability.
References
Baxi, U. (1980). The Indian Supreme Court and politics.
Bhagwati, P. N. (1987). Judicial activism and public interest litigation.
Bickel, A. (1962). The Least Dangerous Branch. Yale University Press.
Jain, M. P. (2016). Indian Constitutional Law. LexisNexis.
Sathe, S. P. (2002). Judicial Activism in India. Oxford University Press.
Seervai, H. M. (1991). Constitutional Law of India. Universal Law Publishing.
Tushnet, M. (1999). Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton University Press.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


