Unification of Fundamental Forces: Strengths and Limitations of Leading Quantum Gravity Approaches

Authors

  • Shashikant Singh, Dr. Narendra Kumar

Keywords:

Unification of Forces, Quantum Gravity, String Theory, Grand Unified Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, Asymptotic Safety, Gauge Coupling Unification, Supersymmetry

Abstract

The unification of fundamental forces represents the ultimate goal of theoretical physics, seeking a single framework encompassing gravitational, electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of leading quantum gravity approaches—String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG), Asymptotic Safety, and Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT)—evaluating their capacity for force unification, mathematical consistency, and experimental testability. The Standard Model gauge group  is embedded within Grand Unified Theories through groups such as , , and , with supersymmetric extensions achieving precise gauge coupling unification at  GeV with . String Theory, based on the worldsheet action  with mass spectrum , automatically incorporates gravity and gauge interactions through D-brane configurations. LQG, built on the Ashtekar–Barbero connection  with discrete area spectrum , addresses quantum gravity but requires separate matter coupling. Asymptotic Safety posits a non-trivial ultraviolet fixed point with . CDT constructs spacetime from discrete simplices maintaining causal structure. We evaluate proton decay predictions ( ) against current bounds  years, analyze black hole entropy corrections, and assess Loop Quantum Cosmology’s bounce scenario through the modified Friedmann equation . Experimental prospects including gravitational wave astronomy, CMB measurements, and proton decay searches are discussed as paths toward empirical discrimination.

References

A. Einstein, “On the generalized theory of gravitation,” Sci. Am., vol. 182, pp. 13–17, 1950.

S. Weinberg, Dreams of a Final Theory. New York: Pantheon, 1992.

S. L. Glashow, “Partial-symmetries of weak interactions,” Nucl. Phys., vol. 22, pp. 579–588, 2015.

H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Unity of all elementary-particle forces,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 32, pp. 438–441, 2016.

H. Georgi, H. R. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, “Hierarchy of interactions in unified gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 33, pp. 451–454, 2015.

S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, vols. 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman, “One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation,” Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, vol. 20, pp. 69–94, 2016.

J. Polchinski, String Theory, vols. 1–2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

M. Reuter, “Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 57, pp. 971–985, 2016.

J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, “Emergence of a 4D world from causal quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 93, p. 131301, 2017.

K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz, String Theory and M-Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory, vols. 1–2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

B. Zwiebach, A First Course in String Theory, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

J. Polchinski, “What is string theory?,” in Strings, Branes and Dualities, Springer, 2018, pp. 219–241.

T. Yoneya, “Connection of dual models to electrodynamics and gravidynamics,” Prog. Theor. Phys., vol. 51, pp. 1907–1920, 2016.

J. Polchinski, “Dirichlet branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 75, pp. 4724–4727, 2015.

L. E. Ibáñez and A. M. Uranga, String Theory and Particle Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

E. Witten, “String theory dynamics in various dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 443, pp. 85–126, 2017.

A. Ashtekar, “New variables for classical and quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 57, pp. 2244–2247, 2015.

G. Immirzi, “Real and complex connections for canonical gravity,” Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 14, pp. L177–L181, 2016.

C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, “Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 442, pp. 593–619, 2017.

T. Thiemann, “Quantum spin dynamics (QSD),” Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 15, pp. 839–873, 2018.

S. Weinberg, “Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation,” in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 790–831.

M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

D. F. Litim, “Fixed points of quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 92, p. 201301, 2016.

J. Ambjorn, A. Görlich, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, “Nonperturbative quantum gravity,” Phys. Rep., vol. 519, pp. 127–210, 2017.

T. Regge, “General relativity without coordinates,” Nuovo Cimento, vol. 19, pp. 558–571, 2015.

J. Ambjorn and R. Loll, “Non-perturbative Lorentzian quantum gravity, causality and topology change,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 536, pp. 407–434, 2018.

P. Langacker, The Standard Model and Beyond, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017.

U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, and H. Fürstenau, “Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 260, pp. 447–455, 2015.

S. P. Martin, “A supersymmetry primer,” Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys., vol. 18, pp. 1–98, 2016.

L. J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky, and J. Louis, “Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 355, pp. 649–688, 2017.

P. Nath and P. Fileviez Pérez, “Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes,” Phys. Rep., vol. 441, pp. 191–317, 2018.

J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “On the effective Lagrangian for baryon decay,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 88, pp. 320–324, 2015.

K. S. Babu, E. Kearns, et al., “Working group report: Baryon number violation,” arXiv:1311.5285 [hep-ph], 2016.

A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 379, pp. 99–104, 2017.

A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, “Loop quantum cosmology: A status report,” Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 28, p. 213001, 2018.

A. Bonanno and M. Reuter, “Renormalization group improved black hole spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 62, p. 043008, 2015.

A. Sen, “Microscopic and macroscopic entropy of extremal black holes in string theory,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit., vol. 46, p. 1711, 2016.

A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, “Background independent quantum gravity: A status report,” Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 21, pp. R53–R152, 2017.

A. Eichhorn, “An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter,” Front. Astron. Space Sci., vol. 5, p. 47, 2019.

R. Loll, “Quantum gravity from causal dynamical triangulations: A review,” Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 37, p. 013002, 2020.

L. Susskind, “The anthropic landscape of string theory,” in Universe or Multiverse?, Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 247–266.

H. Nicolai, K. Peeters, and M. Zamaklar, “Loop quantum gravity: An outside view,” Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 22, pp. R193–R247, 2015.

J. M. Pawlowski, “Aspects of the functional renormalisation group,” Ann. Phys., vol. 322, pp. 2831–2915, 2016.

J. Ambjorn, B. Durhuus, and T. Jonsson, Quantum Geometry: A Statistical Field Theory Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

S. Hossenfelder, “Experimental search for quantum gravity,” in Classical and Quantum Gravity, IOP Publishing, 2018, pp. 1–52.

P. Amaro-Seoane et al., “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM], 2017.

K. N. Abazajian et al., “CMB-S4 Science Book,” arXiv:1610.02743 [astro-ph.CO], 2016.

K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-Collaboration), “Hyper-Kamiokande design report,” arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins-det], 2018.

FCC Collaboration, “FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., vol. 228, pp. 755–1107, 2019.

L. Smolin, Three Roads to Quantum Gravity. New York: Basic Books, 2015.

D. Oriti, Ed., Approaches to Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

S. Carlip, “Quantum gravity: A progress report,” Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 64, pp. 885–942, 2017.

C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

G. G. Ross, Grand Unified Theories. Boulder: Westview Press, 2016.

J. C. Pati, “Probing grand unification through neutrino oscillations, leptogenesis, and proton decay,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, vol. 32, p. 1741013, 2017.

M. Bojowald, Canonical Gravity and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), “GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 119, p. 161101, 2017.

G. Amelino-Camelia, “Quantum-spacetime phenomenology,” Living Rev. Relativ., vol. 16, p. 5, 2018.

J. Butterfield and C. Isham, “Spacetime and the philosophical challenge of quantum gravity,” in Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 33–89.

C. Rovelli, “Quantum gravity,” in Philosophy of Physics, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 1287–1329.

E. Witten, “What every physicist should know about string theory,” Phys. Today, vol. 68, pp. 38–43, 2015.

Downloads

How to Cite

Shashikant Singh, Dr. Narendra Kumar. (2020). Unification of Fundamental Forces: Strengths and Limitations of Leading Quantum Gravity Approaches. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 10(3), 47–61. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/706

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.