Neuroscience and Education: A Systematic Review of Brain-Based Learning Theories and Their Influence on Teaching Methods

Authors

  • Jawad Parayangattu, Dr. Sarika Goel

Keywords:

Neuroscience and Education; Brain-Based Learning; Teaching Methods; Cognitive Neuroscience; Student Engagement; Neuroplasticity; Executive Function

Abstract

In the last few decades, we've seen some exciting developments in cognitive neuroscience that have really shaped how we think about education. This has led to a fascinating blend of neuroscience and education. In this review paper, we take a close look at brain-based learning theories and how they impact teaching methods. We’ll explore how insights from neuroscience can enhance instructional design, boost student engagement, and improve learning outcomes. By diving into various empirical studies, theoretical models, and meta-analyses from 2000 to 2024, we gather evidence on key topics like neuroplasticity, information processing, cognitive load, executive functions, emotional regulation, and social-emotional learning. The paper also examines how these scientific principles can be applied in the classroom through techniques like multisensory instruction, metacognitive scaffolding, supportive learning environments, and student-centered teaching. Additionally, we discuss some of the hurdles that come with applying neuroscience in education, such as the ongoing spread of neuromyths and disconnect between lab research and real-world teaching. Our findings suggest that when we base our teaching strategies on solid scientific principles, brain-based learning can really enhance teaching effectiveness, student engagement, academic success, and overall learner development. We wrap up by discussing the implications for educational practice, teacher training, and policy, while also pointing out some exciting avenues for future research in neuroscience-informed teaching.

References

Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007

Ansari, D., De Smedt, B., & Grabner, R. H. (2017). Neuroeducation—A critical overview of an emerging field. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17727608

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (2014). Natural learning for a connected world: Education, technology, and the human brain. Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.153779

Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/427311a

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3817

Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x

Immordino-Yang, M. H., Darling-Hammond, L., & Krone, C. (2019). Nurturing nature: How brain development is inherently social and emotional. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633924

Kolb, B., & Gibb, R. (2011). Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(4), 265–276.

Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. Oxford University Press.

McEwen, B. S., & Morrison, J. H. (2013). The brain on stress: Vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(45), 17624–17634. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3028-13.2013

Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006

Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Corwin Press.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4

Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide to the new brain-based teaching. W. W. Norton & Company.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102

Downloads

How to Cite

Jawad Parayangattu, Dr. Sarika Goel. (2024). Neuroscience and Education: A Systematic Review of Brain-Based Learning Theories and Their Influence on Teaching Methods. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 14(2), 141–151. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/569

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.