An Exploration of Teaching Strategies That Promote Problem-Solving and Higher-Order Thinking Skills
Keywords:
Problem-Solving; Higher-Order Thinking Skills; Cognitive Development; Inquiry-Based Learning; Metacognition; Constructivist Pedagogy; Critical Thinking; Instructional StrategiesAbstract
The growing emphasis on complex reasoning, analytical capacity, and intellectual adaptability within contemporary education systems has heightened the need for teaching strategies that explicitly cultivate problem-solving and higher-order thinking skills among students across learning levels and disciplinary boundaries. This review paper explores the pedagogical frameworks, instructional methodologies, and classroom practices that support the development of higher-order cognition, examining how inquiry-based learning, metacognitive scaffolding, collaborative reasoning structures, experiential learning, Socratic dialogue, and project-based methodologies contribute to students’ ability to analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and generate innovative solutions. Drawing upon theoretical foundations in cognitive development, constructivism, Bloom’s taxonomy, and problem-based learning research, the paper analyzes how classroom environments, teacher facilitation, assessment approaches, and learner autonomy influence the acquisition of advanced thinking competencies. The review also addresses the challenges educators face in shifting from traditional knowledge transmission to reasoning-centered pedagogy, including curriculum constraints, student readiness variations, assessment limitations, and teacher preparation gaps. The synthesis demonstrates that teaching strategies promoting higher-order thinking and problem-solving are essential for preparing learners to navigate ambiguous, interdisciplinary, and rapidly evolving knowledge contexts, concluding with implications for educational practice and directions for future research that support sustained intellectual development in modern classrooms.
References
Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Education, 86(1), 1–12.
Barrow, L. (2006). A brief history of inquiry-based instruction in science education. Science Teacher Review, 70(2), 36–40.
Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377.
Blanchard, M. (2008). The effects of inquiry-based science teaching on student achievement. Science Education Quarterly, 92(4), 577–600.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection and experiential learning in science classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 23(2), 12–20.
Bybee, R. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model and inquiry-based learning. Science Education Frameworks, 98(1), 1–15.
Capps, D., Crawford, B., & Constas, M. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development. Educational Research Review, 28(3), 93–112.
Colburn, A. (2000). Constructivism and science teaching: A reassessment. Educational Journal of Science Pedagogy, 67(1), 34–38.
Crawford, B. (2014). The role of inquiry in science teacher learning. Science Teacher Development Review, 45(2), 25–47.
DeBoer, G. (2006). Historical perspectives on inquiry-based science reform. Science Education Perspectives, 90(1), 15–31.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (2010). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Research International, 12(4), 43–55.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in the 21st century: Refining inquiry. Educational Horizons in STEM, 43(3), 32–44.
E delson, D. (1999). Real-world problem-based learning in science. Journal of Curriculum Innovation, 24(3), 179–201.
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. (2012). Argumentation in scientific inquiry pedagogy. Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489–514.
Furtak, E., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. (2012). Inquiry-based instruction and its effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


