The Socio-Legal Framework of Juvenile Delinquency in India: A Critical Analysis

Authors

  • Manjiri Gautam Joshi, Dr. Mehul R. Shah

Keywords:

juvenile delinquency; juvenile justice; children in conflict with law; Juvenile Justice Act 2015; preliminary assessment; rehabilitation; child rights.

Abstract

Juvenile delinquency occupies a distinctive place within the criminal justice system, for the response of the State to children in conflict with law proceeds not upon the ordinary assumptions of full culpability and deterrence but upon the assumptions of diminished culpability, developmental immaturity and amenability to reform. This paper examines the socio-legal framework governing juvenile delinquency in India, tracing its historical development from the colonial statutes of the nineteenth century to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and situating it within the constitutional provisions relating to children and the international standards embodied in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It analyses the principal provisions of the 2015 Act, including the controversial provision permitting the trial of older adolescents as adults for heinous offences, and it examines the institutional machinery of the framework and the body of judicial decisions that has elaborated it. The paper offers a critical evaluation of the framework, arguing that it is, in its design, a progressive and reformative one, but that its operation in practice is beset by significant deficiencies of implementation. It concludes that the principal challenge confronting the juvenile justice system in India lies not in the redesign of the framework but in the closing of the gap between the law as declared and the law as implemented.

References

Books and Articles

Kumari, V. (2010). The Juvenile Justice System in India: From Welfare to Rights (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2023). Annual Report 2022–23. New Delhi: Government of India.

National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). (2023). Crime in India 2022 (Vol. I). New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.

Paranjape, N. V. (2019). Criminology, Penology and Victimology (18th ed.). Allahabad: Central Law Publications.

Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106.

Cases

Barun Chandra Thakur v. Master Bholu, (2023) 12 SCC 401.

Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Raju, (2014) 8 SCC 390.

Pratap Singh v. State of Jharkhand, (2005) 3 SCC 551.

Salil Bali v. Union of India, (2013) 7 SCC 705.

Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, (2018) 4 SCC 433.

Sheela Barse v. Union of India, (1986) 3 SCC 596.

Shilpa Mittal v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2020) 2 SCC 787.

Statutes and International Instruments

The Apprentices Act, 1850.

The Reformatory Schools Act, 1897.

The Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The Children Act, 1960.

The Juvenile Justice Act, 1986.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

The Constitution of India, 1950.

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989.

United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, 1985 (Beijing Rules).

United Nations Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency, 1990 (Riyadh Guidelines).

Downloads

How to Cite

Manjiri Gautam Joshi, Dr. Mehul R. Shah. (2023). The Socio-Legal Framework of Juvenile Delinquency in India: A Critical Analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 13(3), 186–197. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/1158

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.