A Review of Ultra-Low-Power Wearable Technologies for ECG, EEG, and EMG Monitoring

Authors

  • Patil Manish Madhukar, Dr. Rocky Kumar

Keywords:

wearable sensors, biopotential acquisition, ultra-low-power circuits, ECG, EEG, EMG, energy harvesting, edge computing

Abstract

Continuous, unobtrusive acquisition of biopotential signals outside the clinic has become one of the defining ambitions of modern biomedical engineering. Electrocardiography (ECG), electroencephalography (EEG), and electromyography (EMG) each carry diagnostically rich information about cardiac, neural, and neuromuscular function, yet all three have historically depended on bulky, mains-powered instrumentation confined to hospitals and laboratories. Over the past decade, advances in low-voltage analog circuit design, aggressive digital power gating, embedded machine learning, and body-worn energy harvesting have collectively made it plausible to acquire these signals for days or weeks from a device weighing only a few grams. This review examines the technological foundations that make such ultra-low-power operation possible. It surveys electrode technologies and analog front-end architectures that reduce acquisition power into the microwatt regime while preserving the input-referred noise and common-mode rejection required for clinical utility; embedded processing strategies, including event-driven and neuromorphic classifiers, that suppress radio activity by transmitting decisions rather than raw waveforms; wireless communication protocols and duty-cycling schemes that dominate the system energy budget in most practical designs; and harvesting and power-management approaches that point toward battery-free or self-sustaining operation. Three comparative tables consolidate reported performance figures across representative front-ends, embedded classifiers, and energy sources. The review concludes that the field has largely solved the acquisition problem at the circuit level, and that the remaining bottlenecks are systemic: motion artifact robustness, electrode–skin stability over long deployments, the mismatch between harvested and demanded power, and the absence of standardized reporting that would allow fair comparison across published designs.

References

Amirshahi, A., & Hashemi, M. (2019). ECG classification algorithm based on STDP and R-STDP neural networks for real-time monitoring on ultra low-power personal wearable devices. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 13(6), 1483–1493.

Bandodkar, A. J., Gutruf, P., Choi, J., Lee, K., Sekine, Y., Reeder, J. T., Jeang, W. J., Aranyosi, A. J., Lee, S. P., Model, J. B., Ghaffari, R., Su, C.-J., Leshock, J. P., Ray, T., Verrillo, A., Thomas, K., Krishnamurthi, V., Han, S., Kim, J., … Rogers, J. A. (2019). Battery-free, skin-interfaced microfluidic/electronic systems for simultaneous electrochemical, colorimetric, and volumetric analysis of sweat. Science Advances, 5(1), eaav3294.

Benatti, S., Milosevic, B., Farella, E., Gruppioni, E., & Benini, L. (2017). A prosthetic hand body area controller based on efficient pattern recognition control strategies. Sensors, 17(4), 869.

Casson, A. J. (2019). Wearable EEG and beyond. Biomedical Engineering Letters, 9(1), 53–71.

Dieffenderfer, J., Goodell, H., Mills, S., McKnight, M., Yao, S., Lin, F., Beppler, E., Bent, B., Lee, B., Misra, V., Zhu, Y., Oralkan, O., Strohmaier, J., Muth, J., Peden, D., & Bozkurt, A. (2016). Low-power wearable systems for continuous monitoring of environment and health for chronic respiratory disease. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 20(5), 1251–1264.

Guk, K., Han, G., Lim, J., Jeong, K., Kang, T., Lim, E.-K., & Jung, J. (2019). Evolution of wearable devices with real-time disease monitoring for personalized healthcare. Nanomaterials, 9(6), 813.

Ingolfsson, T. M., Hersche, M., Wang, X., Kobayashi, N., Cavigelli, L., & Benini, L. (2020). EEG-TCNet: An accurate temporal convolutional network for embedded motor-imagery brain–machine interfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2958–2965.

Iqbal, S. M. A., Mahgoub, I., Du, E., Leavitt, M. A., & Asghar, W. (2021). Advances in healthcare wearable devices. npj Flexible Electronics, 5, 9.

Islam, M. K., Rastegarnia, A., & Yang, Z. (2016). Methods for artifact detection and removal from scalp EEG: A review. Neurophysiologie Clinique, 46(4–5), 287–305.

Konijnenburg, M., Stanzione, S., Yan, L., Jee, D.-W., Pettine, J., van Wegberg, R., Kim, H., van Liempd, C., Fish, R., Schueller, J., Huijgen, P., Ashouei, M., Torfs, T., de Groot, H., Van Hoof, C., & Van Helleputte, N. (2016). A multi(bio)sensor acquisition system with integrated processor, power management, 8×8 LED drivers, and simultaneously synchronized ECG, bio-impedance, GSR, and two PPG readouts. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 51(11), 2584–2595.

Ostfeld, A. E., Gaikwad, A. M., Khan, Y., & Arias, A. C. (2016). High-performance flexible energy storage and harvesting system for wearable electronics. Scientific Reports, 6, 26122.

Shad, E. H. T., Molinas, M., & Ytterdal, T. (2020). Impedance and noise of passive and active dry EEG electrodes: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(24), 14565–14577.

Sopic, D., Aminifar, A., Aminifar, A., & Atienza, D. (2018). Real-time event-driven classification technique for early detection and prevention of myocardial infarction on wearable systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 12(5), 982–992.

Sun, Y., & Yu, X. B. (2016). Capacitive biopotential measurement for electrophysiological signal acquisition: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(9), 2832–2853.

Tosi, J., Taffoni, F., Santacatterina, M., Sannino, R., & Formica, D. (2017). Performance evaluation of Bluetooth Low Energy: A systematic review. Sensors, 17(12), 2898.

Van Helleputte, N., Konijnenburg, M., Pettine, J., Jee, D.-W., Kim, H., Morgado, A., van Wegberg, R., Torfs, T., Mohan, R., Breeschoten, A., de Groot, H., Van Hoof, C., & Yazicioglu, R. F. (2015). A 345 µW multi-sensor biomedical SoC with bio-impedance, 3-channel ECG, motion artifact reduction, and integrated DSP. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 50(1), 230–244.

Xiong, D., Zhang, D., Zhao, X., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Deep learning for EMG-based human–machine interaction: A review. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 8(3), 512–533.

Xu, J., Mitra, S., Van Hoof, C., Yazicioglu, R. F., & Makinwa, K. A. A. (2017). Active electrodes for wearable EEG acquisition: Review and electronics design methodology. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 10, 187–198.

Yin, L., Kim, K. N., Lv, J., Tehrani, F., Lin, M., Lin, Z., Moon, J.-M., Ma, J., Yu, J., Xu, S., & Wang, J. (2021). A self-sustainable wearable multi-modular E-textile bioenergy microgrid system. Nature Communications, 12, 1542.

Zanghieri, M., Benatti, S., Burrello, A., Kartsch, V., Conti, F., & Benini, L. (2020). Robust real-time embedded EMG recognition framework using temporal convolutional networks on a multicore IoT processor. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 14(2), 244–256.

Downloads

How to Cite

Patil Manish Madhukar, Dr. Rocky Kumar. (2023). A Review of Ultra-Low-Power Wearable Technologies for ECG, EEG, and EMG Monitoring. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 13(3), 171–185. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/1128