Advancements in Geological Mapping Integrating Remote Sensing, GIS, and Digital Technologies

Authors

  • Ashutosh Nimba Patil

Keywords:

Geological mapping; remote sensing; geographic information systems; machine learning; lithological classification; digital field geology; unmanned aerial vehicles

Abstract

Geological mapping has undergone a structural transformation over the past two decades, moving from an essentially analogue, observation-limited craft to a data-intensive, computationally mediated science. A mixed-methods design was adopted, combining a structured review of the literature with a comparative meta-analytic assessment of classification accuracy, data-acquisition efficiency and positional reliability across three generations of mapping workflow: conventional analogue survey, remote sensing supported by geographic information systems, and fully integrated digital mapping incorporating unmanned aerial vehicles, three-dimensional virtual outcrop models and machine learning. Results indicate that ensemble and deep-learning classifiers substantially outperform conventional parametric methods, with convolutional neural networks achieving a mean overall accuracy of 88.9 per cent compared with 71.4 per cent for maximum likelihood classification. Fusion of optical imagery with digital elevation and geophysical layers improves overall accuracy by a further six to eight percentage points across all sensor families, and hyperspectral data yield the highest single-sensor accuracies. Integrated digital workflows reduce field time per unit area by approximately seventy-four per cent and positional error by an order of magnitude relative to analogue practice, while increasing the volume of structural measurements collected per field day by a factor of nearly five. The paper concludes that remote sensing, geographic information systems and digital field technologies are most effective when treated as a single integrated system rather than as separate tools, and that the principal remaining constraints are the availability of reliable training data, the interpretability of complex models and the uneven distribution of technical capacity between geological surveys.

References

Bachri, I., Hakdaoui, M., Raji, M., Teodoro, A. C., & Benbouziane, A. (2019). Machine learning algorithms for automatic lithological mapping using remote sensing data: A case study from Souk Arbaa Sahel, Sidi Ifni Inlier, Western Anti-Atlas, Morocco. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(6), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8060248

Bahrami, H., Esmaeili, P., Homayouni, S., Pour, A. B., Chokmani, K., & Bahroudi, A. (2022). Machine learning-based lithological mapping from ASTER remote-sensing imagery. Minerals, 14(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020202

Belgiu, M., & Dragut, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 24-31.

Brush, J. A., Pavlis, T. L., Hurtado, J. M., Mason, K. A., Knott, J. R., & Williams, K. E. (2019). Evaluation of field methods for 3-D mapping and 3-D visualization of complex metamorphic structure using multiview stereo terrain models from ground-based photography. Geosphere, 15(1), 188-221.

Cawood, A. J., Bond, C. E., Howell, J. A., Butler, R. W. H., & Totake, Y. (2017). LiDAR, UAV or compass-clinometer? Accuracy, coverage and the effects on structural models. Journal of Structural Geology, 98, 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.04.004

Dong, Y., Yang, Z., Liu, Q., Zuo, R., & Wang, Z. (2022). Fusion of GaoFen-5 and Sentinel-2B data for lithological mapping using vision transformer dynamic graph convolutional network. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 129, 103780.

Hajaj, S., El Harti, A., Pour, A. B., Jellouli, A., Adiri, Z., & Hashim, M. (2022). A review on hyperspectral imagery application for lithological mapping and mineral prospecting: Machine learning techniques and future prospects. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 35, 101218.

Liu, H., Wu, K., Xu, H., & Xu, Y. (2021). Lithology classification using TASI thermal infrared hyperspectral data with convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 13(16), 3117.

Nesbit, P. R., Durkin, P. R., Hugenholtz, C. H., Hubbard, S. M., & Kucharczyk, M. (2018). 3-D stratigraphic mapping using a digital outcrop model derived from UAV images and structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geosphere, 14(6), 2469-2486.

Novakova, L., & Pavlis, T. L. (2017). Assessment of the precision of smart phones and tablets for measurement of planar orientations: A case study. Journal of Structural Geology, 97, 93-103.

Pal, M., Rasmussen, T., & Porwal, A. (2020). Optimized lithological mapping from multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing images using fused multi-classifiers. Remote Sensing, 12(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010177

Pan, T., Zuo, R., & Wang, Z. (2021). Geological mapping via convolutional neural network based on remote sensing and geochemical survey data in vegetation coverage areas. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 16, 3485-3494.

Pavlis, T. L., & Mason, K. A. (2017). The new world of 3D geologic mapping. GSA Today, 27(9), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG313A.1

Shebl, A., Abdellatif, M., Hissen, M., Abdelaziz, M. I., & Csamer, A. (2021). Lithological mapping enhancement by integrating Sentinel 2 and gamma-ray data utilizing support vector machine: A case study from Egypt. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 105, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102619

Shebl, A., Abriha, D., Fahil, A. S., El-Dokouny, H. A., Elrasheed, A. A., & Csamer, A. (2021). PRISMA hyperspectral data for lithological mapping in the Egyptian Eastern Desert: Evaluating the support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost machine learning algorithms. Ore Geology Reviews, 161, 105652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.105652

Shirmard, H., Farahbakhsh, E., Beiranvand Pour, A., Muslim, A. M., Muller, R. D., & Chandra, R. (2020). Integration of selective dimensionality reduction techniques for mineral exploration using ASTER satellite data. Remote Sensing, 12(8), 1261.

Shirmard, H., Farahbakhsh, E., Heidari, E., Beiranvand Pour, A., Pradhan, B., Muller, R. D., & Chandra, R. (2022a). A comparative study of convolutional neural networks and conventional machine learning models for lithological mapping using remote sensing data. Remote Sensing, 14(4), 819.

Shirmard, H., Farahbakhsh, E., Muller, R. D., & Chandra, R. (2022b). A review of machine learning in processing remote sensing data for mineral exploration. Remote Sensing of Environment, 268, 112750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112750

Sun, T., Chen, F., Zhong, L., Liu, W., & Wang, Y. (2019). GIS-based mineral prospectivity mapping using machine learning methods: A case study from Tongling ore district, eastern China. Ore Geology Reviews, 109, 26-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.04.003

Xiong, Y., Zuo, R., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2018). Mapping mineral prospectivity through big data analytics and a deep learning algorithm. Ore Geology Reviews, 102, 811-817.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ashutosh Nimba Patil. (2023). Advancements in Geological Mapping Integrating Remote Sensing, GIS, and Digital Technologies. International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities, 13(3), 147–170. Retrieved from https://www.ijesh.com/j/article/view/1126

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.