Development of a Mathematical Risk Prediction Model: A Quantitative Approach for Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
Keywords:
Mathematical modelling, risk prediction, probability analysis, statistical modelling, predictive analytics, uncertainty management, decision support.Abstract
Risk prediction has become an increasingly important area of research because individuals, organizations, governments, and industries operate in environments characterized by uncertainty and complexity. The ability to anticipate possible future risks enables decision-makers to develop preventive strategies, allocate resources efficiently, and minimize negative consequences. In many sectors, including healthcare, finance, environmental management, engineering, cybersecurity, and business operations, inaccurate risk assessment can result in significant economic losses, operational disruptions, and social impacts. Therefore, developing reliable mathematical approaches for predicting risk has become a major research priority.
Traditional risk assessment approaches often depend heavily on expert opinions, historical experience, and qualitative judgments. Although these methods provide valuable insights, they may suffer from subjectivity, inconsistency, and limited ability to analyze complex relationships among multiple risk factors. Mathematical risk prediction models provide an alternative approach by transforming uncertain events into measurable probabilities through the application of statistical analysis, probability theory, optimization techniques, and computational methods.
This study focuses on the development of a mathematical risk prediction model that integrates multiple risk indicators into a structured analytical framework. The proposed model applies mathematical functions to estimate the probability and severity of future risk events by assigning appropriate weights to different influencing factors. The model generates a numerical risk index that allows risks to be classified into different categories, supporting early warning systems and evidence-based decision-making.
The research contributes to the field of risk management by presenting a quantitative framework that improves objectivity, consistency, and predictive capability. The developed approach can be adapted across different fields by modifying variables according to specific risk environments. The study further emphasizes the importance of combining mathematical modeling with reliable data collection and continuous model evaluation to improve prediction accuracy.
References
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2018). Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 173, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.012
Bedford, T., & Cooke, R. (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methods. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521773202
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–220.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
Harrell, F. E. (2015). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer.
Helmus, L. M., & Babchishin, K. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816678898
Koller, D., & Friedman, N. (2009). Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. MIT Press.
Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2014). Applied statistics and probability for engineers (6th ed.). Wiley.
Panjer, H. H. (2006). Operational risk: Modeling analytics. Wiley.
Riley, R. D., Ensor, J., & Snell, K. I. E. (2016). Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ, 353, i2618. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2618
Singpurwalla, N. D. (2006). Reliability and risk: A Bayesian perspective. Wiley.
Stødle, K., Aven, T., & others. (2023). Data-driven predictive modeling in risk assessment: Challenges and directions for proper uncertainty representation. Risk Analysis, 43, 2644–2658. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14128.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Engineering Science & Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


